Q&A Questions & Answers

(1) Do we have all the answers figured out?

No. The core belief is that foundational systems like the governance of monetary policy and economies will be digitized onto crypto rails and improved with AI.

Together, we will figure out improvements iteratively over years and decades toward the north star of a new digital Bitplanet that is more modern, equitable, and efficient.

(2) How does the attribution and provenance system ensure the integrity of contributions across different AI dApps?

Initially, BPL stakers apply discretionary judgement to discern positive-sum actors. Over time, this can be more and more aided by AI. In the future, Brahma should leverage AI to autonomously verify contributions using on-chain data, cross-reference attribution patterns across AI dApps, and algorithmically detect gaming or manipulation—progressively shifting integrity verification from human discretion to automated, transparent processes while maintaining BPL governance oversight for policy decisions.

(3) What mechanisms are in place to prevent gaming or exploitation of the incentive system?

Initially, AI apps applying for Proof of Contributions and BPL stakers apply discretionary judgement to discern positive-sum actors. Over time, this can be more and more aided by AI.

(4) Can the AI-DApps operate independently of the Bitplanet ecosystem, or are they reliant on its infrastructure?

Yes AI Apps can operate independently of Bitplanet ecosystem. They can optionally use infra like Deva SSO and SDK. They can also directly call the chain for Proof of Contributions.

(5) How is the value of Cores determined, and what factors influence their market price?

Core pricing are determined by market buys and sells. The price of Cores do not affect the system because the Cores' most important purpose are attribution markers for future BPL emission rewards. Thus the system is not trying to maximize the value or ensure price stability of Cores.

(6) How does the system ensure fairness in the distribution of rewards, particularly between AI creators, builders, and users?

BPL stakers discuss in forum and vote in governance for the economic splits. Initially this may be more input-focused for Proof of Contributions (AI creators, trainers, distributors, developers) and later more output focused like revenue or market capitalizations.

(7) Should we expect some people to transition from being capable of being productive members of society to not being capable of being productive members of society? If so, what is the plan for those people?

It makes sense to design an economy where people can contribute at different levels of knowledge and skills with an objective and agreed upon end evaluation like revenue inflows and AI asset value.